1. I had no problem at all removing a gem.
2. It was made to prevent an exploit.
Printable View
1. I had no problem at all removing a gem.
2. It was made to prevent an exploit.
I don't get it - it always was needed to have the item you wanted to remove the gem from along with alkahest inside your inventory - meaning un-equipped
- if that was any different for the legendary ring, this just looks like a simple bugfix, nothing more
or?
Well, we thought had a reason to whine, complain and drag Funcom over the coals for a colossal screw up. That they actually did good and fixed something is a massive letdown, a slap in the face really, and now we're reduced to complaining that there's nothing to complain about.
Or something.
So this is how people were getting all the different gem procs from one ring?
no
/10char
This is my favorite thread.