white sands pvp

[Geldour]

Good luck with that philosophy then, since you also forgot the most likely route people will take under such a "reward only the winner and already strong system": stop playing or cheat for the rewards.

There is a reason successfull board-games, other computer games and real life sports are going a different route.

I am not arguing rewarding the winners though, but the rewards should be different. There is a LOT of grey area between OP rewards for winning and NO rewards for loosing and the miniscule pvp xp you might get for participating now.

Even you admit, that there should be a way to get better. Now what if that way is either not possible or no fun? So i am back to the "stop playing or cheat" part.

i dont lose so i get rewarded

[Caudilloo]

Everyone loses when less people fight.

[Geldour]

Everyone loses when less people fight.

not me, i still win

[mrcorp]

not me, i still win

Perhaps because you only come out in a Zerg?

[Ryiuu]

I don't understand why everyone now uses the word "Zerg"

having a group of 6 is not a zerg, fighting 5v4 is not zerging, fighting 8v10 is not zerging.

12v6 now that is zerging, 24v12 that is zerging, 30v18 in siege that is called zerg.

Get it right people.

[Gkahn]

I don't understand why everyone now uses the word "Zerg"

having a group of 6 is not a zerg, fighting 5v4 is not zerging, fighting 8v10 is not zerging.

12v6 now that is zerging, 24v12 that is zerging, 30v18 in siege that is called zerg.

Get it right people.

Riyu for prez

[mrcorp]

I don't understand why everyone now uses the word "Zerg"

having a group of 6 is not a zerg, fighting 5v4 is not zerging, fighting 8v10 is not zerging.

12v6 now that is zerging, 24v12 that is zerging, 30v18 in siege that is called zerg.

Get it right people.

You forgot to add, IMO. A Zerg, IMO, is bringing double the players. So if I have 2, you bring 4. I think you get the idea.

However, you missed my point. He doesn't come out unless he has a solid group to support him. Nothing wrong with that, no need to get defensive, just an observation. And given your quick to respond statement, I take it you were offended. For that I am deeply sorry.

The reason for my comment, is that is exactly what I witnessed yesterday from him.

[Ryiuu]

You forgot to add, IMO. A Zerg, IMO, is bringing double the players. So if I have 2, you bring 4. I think you get the idea.

However, you missed my point. He doesn't come out unless he has a solid group to support him. Nothing wrong with that, no need to get defensive, just an observation. And given your quick to respond statement, I take it you were offended. For that I am deeply sorry.

The reason for my comment, is that is exactly what I witnessed yesterday from him.

2v4 is not a zerg, zerg is beyond a single group. That is zerging.

Urban Dictionary
"zerging

n. Using massive amounts of weak, or generic units, to attack an enemy.
Used widely in PlanetSide, to describe massive amount of soliders that spawn in a tower, and then attack a base.
It comes from the word zerg. Zergs in Starcraft were able to produce large amount of units very quickly.

I hate, when base assault comes down to zerging"

Zerging means a "Massive" amount. Keyword is massive.

In aoc, that is open world pvp where a guild brings out 24 to fight 6 or 12 players. That is called zerging.

in a situation of 2v4 3v5 4v6 etc, are just unfortunate circumstances for the people who had no one to group with. If you're in a guild of only 3 players, then any pvp more than 3 player can be a zerg to you.

What do you expect people to do? 4 of us online, only 2 of us are allowed to pvp because you have no one else to group with? seriously?

I'd understand if we got 12 players out fighting 6 of you, it'd be reasonable for 6 of us to sit out. Usually we're only rolling around 4-6 players 8 at most and usually the pvp events prevents the second group from getting anything so we have to attack each other.


No I'm not offended, I don't understand how you come to that conclusion. No I didn't look at timing of my reply nor did I care, I saw what you post so I replied. I'm more irritated or annoyed than "offended"

[Geldour]

You forgot to add, IMO. A Zerg, IMO, is bringing double the players. So if I have 2, you bring 4. I think you get the idea.

However, you missed my point. He doesn't come out unless he has a solid group to support him. Nothing wrong with that, no need to get defensive, just an observation. And given your quick to respond statement, I take it you were offended. For that I am deeply sorry.

The reason for my comment, is that is exactly what I witnessed yesterday from him.

99% of the time its carnage with 3-4 vs a group of 6 pug.

carnage doesnt group with other guilds, if we have 3 on, we have 3 in the group. everyone else just random invites till they fill there group lol

[mrcorp]

99% of the time its carnage with 3-4 vs a group of 6 pug.

carnage doesnt group with other guilds, if we have 3 on, we have 3 in the group. everyone else just random invites till they fill there group lol

In this particular case, I counted 7 on 3. Again, I don't care, it's just the only time I see you.

As for karate kid, you just like to read your posts because it was the most irrelevant post you have posted in a long time.