I don't follow Ciriths argumentation completely.
What they did was to choose several zones they thought interesting for pvp and added the posters and npcs there. Nothing wrong here.
Maybe then there is a technical reason or workload reason, why they have to add these to the same zones on servers (but then it would be contradictive to the different handling like no quests on crom and permanent quests on fury).
So, assuming it is possible to treat/patch both servers independly, what speaks against using not only cimmerians end, but the other pvp enabled zones on Crom too?
Will it be possible to add these to a third type of zone that is available either through the choice upon entering or a reachable copy of the furian zones from an npc?
It was to me not imperative to do it like they did now. There was no "either full open pvp" or "no quests permanently" choice. Lots of middleground without forcing pvp upon people on a pve server...
So hopefully they are not forgetting these and sooner or later add the quests permanently to crom too, without interfering with pve questzones or changing rulesets of existing zones (even temporarily). Different rulesets on seperately reached instances or new copies of existing stuff are perfectly fine to me, though.