Can't remove gems now?

[Fass]

1. I had no problem at all removing a gem.
2. It was made to prevent an exploit.

[-Shink-]

"Arbalests" are good for removing gems ,yes !I would use one if i was getting 16 alts through raid finder too !

[Direwolfe]

She is wrong. I just removed a gem before I wrote a post. Some people actually bother to check themselves before getting riled up. Others enjoy creating drama for no reason except ignorance.

Apologies. Would have helped had you mentioned that earlier.

[Yorgomir]

I don't get it - it always was needed to have the item you wanted to remove the gem from along with alkahest inside your inventory - meaning un-equipped
- if that was any different for the legendary ring, this just looks like a simple bugfix, nothing more

or?

[Cappa]

....
I checked it myself, and the chaos gem was indeed deleted.
/end thread

i confirm this.

[Raeil]

I don't get it - it always was needed to have the item you wanted to remove the gem from along with alkahest inside your inventory - meaning un-equipped
- if that was any different for the legendary ring, this just looks like a simple bugfix, nothing more

or?

Well, we thought had a reason to whine, complain and drag Funcom over the coals for a colossal screw up. That they actually did good and fixed something is a massive letdown, a slap in the face really, and now we're reduced to complaining that there's nothing to complain about.

Or something.

[Anubium]

Reading is hard. It's easier to create drama on forums.

What part of 'equipped' is unclear in the update notes?

Totally worth making a forum topic though because we have to take the ring off our finger now when we want to remove a gem.

I did post that a guildie unequipped his legendary ring and was unable to use the potion of tainted on the gem.

Apparently he was wrong.

[Chillee]

So this is how people were getting all the different gem procs from one ring?

[Cappa]

no
/10char

[Odonoptera]

This is my favorite thread.