PvP Poll

[Mustaine]

OK, maybe I'm not clear about the OP...

You're still not being clear. You haven't thought this thru. What "incentives" are you talking about, what are these "and such" events ... And why would someone want to have open-world PvP that's broken and exploitable; flagged or otherwise?

The population on Fury is dead for a reason; ask yourself ... why?
The PvP population on Crom is B-String from what's left after the dust has settled.
And you're asking here on these forums; where only a small minority of players come and FUNCOM has already said they don't take high-value from what's said here.

.

[Suctum]

This doesn't sound like a poll, but a petition and it's under the Server forum vs being on the PVP forum. Intent is good, but I doubt you'll get the results your looking for from the player base and even more doubtful to get results from Funcom.

Anyway, YES for open world PVP cuz its da bomb dawg...

It's meant to tally how many people would move back if their playing situation remained the same. So the idea if Fury had pvp incentives or something worthwhile to attract a return for larger pvp oriented guilds, and enough people had interest, then it could become a petition in time. If enough of the larger guilds agreed to move at one time, providing it went far enough to become a petition and could provide for free transfers, then the player base could fix the population problem on fury themselves, providing if Funcom had enough incentive for pvp guilds to move back and the players within those guilds could still do their 6 mans, t4 pugs, ect...unhindered.

It would require 4-6 guilds make the move back, which is unlikely, but why not start a thread anyways just to see.

[K4nnyc]

No.

With OW pvp in its current state, with no working consequence system.
No way.

Crom is better.

[Mustaine]

Let's also take into account the "Social Rejects" ... Those who had players banned because they thought it funny to block the Halloween event from other players. The guild who's players will start a Golem Raid, take the life-essence from players, then simply bolt. The guild who's players blatantly use exploits in minis, have toons banned ... Just to come back and do it again.

Suctum; if Social Rejects are who you actually rep (avatar displays such), no one here should be giving you the time of day let alone support for an idea with no real conscious thought behind it.

[barbaricwildcat2]

this thread got derailed SO much rofl

anwser the question guys

the rest u get banned for trolling or derailing or whatever else

shall we make a brand new thread and start the poll again?

[Mustaine]

...

shall we make a brand new thread and start the poll again?

Nah ~ here is fine .

[legionarium]

http://forums.ageofconan.com/showpos...&postcount=173

first see this and later decide what do you like!

[Evitq]

Let's also take into account the "Social Rejects" ... Those who had players banned because they thought it funny to block the Halloween event from other players. The guild who's players will start a Golem Raid, take the life-essence from players, then simply bolt. The guild who's players blatantly use exploits in minis, have toons banned ... Just to come back and do it again.

Suctum; if Social Rejects are who you actually rep (avatar displays such), no one here should be giving you the time of day let alone support for an idea with no real conscious thought behind it.

Ok, which one of them touched you and where? It was Fuzzy wasn't it... it's always Fuzzy...

[Suctum]

Let's also take into account the "Social Rejects" ... Those who had players banned because they thought it funny to block the Halloween event from other players. The guild who's players will start a Golem Raid, take the life-essence from players, then simply bolt. The guild who's players blatantly use exploits in minis, have toons banned ... Just to come back and do it again.

Suctum; if Social Rejects are who you actually rep (avatar displays such), no one here should be giving you the time of day let alone support for an idea with no real conscious thought behind it.

Cirith already posted he had hopes to reignite fury. I don't see why there's so much hostility about answering a single question:

"Would you move back to Fury if you had some incentive for pvp over playing on Crom if your play experience remained the same?"

It's quite a simple question. I'm not representing any guild or group of players, I'm only one player asking a question and trying to help a game I enjoy. The question is meant to ascertain how many have an interest in open world vs. those who don't care or hate it. My hope was that if enough players signed on, we could then move to TL as a petition and get some kind of incentive for returning to Fury, as well as free transfers to do so, or it would move single server tech forward. But after reading Cirith's post, it's clear they prefer to reengage fury. If that's Funcom's goal, players should help with threads like this to offer Funcom some initial feedback.

[barbaricwildcat2]

my unedrstanding of the silence is that guilds would move, but either dont want to be the first to do it, or dont believe a reasonable surge of pop will happen. suctum, bring acos to fury