Search:

You are right, this is a danger. But the reason again is the ruleset (because right now you already have this grind and boring same enemies over and over). And some events are more population...

That is why i think changing the design is more important than more instances. But even in your example it proves my point of more instances - more people getting tokens. Only that i predict in the...

Then change the design and reward structure. Besides it is not true in this case...a healthy population during these events is not where the design aims at. And it is definitely not true in context...

And where is the con to the arguments here? Even such a trade or such an option is better than NO option or trade at all. You are not forced to buy from certain people, but you could trade with your...

You can argue, if pets are worthwhile rewards or not or which one you like or not, BUT there are several advantages and no real con to make them tradeable.

For example:
You need a pet for your...

Utogi has a point, because the pvp festival right now IS lockout content and catering those already powerful. It is giving close to nothing (except being cannonfodder that is also insulted) to a...

This policy results in people like me not even bothering with that content.

You really should consider doing more for participating motivation and fun, to let people play it, even if they get no...

Not too fast, inbalanced. Compare these 30% on high pvp lvl to 4% from lvl2 to lvl3. Then you know who is the target group of certain events.
No rewards for participating, but insane rewards for...

Feedback:
So far, if you join as pug/solo an existing group event, you make up a third party (yellow), instead of joining (and thus balancing) the red or blue team. Do you think it is fun to be...

Check the sticky guide. There seems to be a technical problem and they are working on it.